﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Education and Labor Committee RSS Articles</title>
    <description>Education and Labor Committee RSS Articles</description>
    <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>RSS.NET: http://www.rssdotnet.com/</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Committee Leaders Request Information on Agencies’ Missing Regulatory Agendas</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Republican leaders on the House Education and the Workforce Committee today &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/UploadedFiles/05-24-13_Letter_OMB_Regulatory_Agenda_Spring_2013.pdf"&gt;sent a letter&lt;/a&gt; to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requesting information regarding the failure of federal agencies to publish their April 2013 regulatory agendas. The members are requesting documents and communications related to the regulatory proposals of the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Labor, and Health and Human Services.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“The Obama administration is once again playing a game of regulatory hide and seek with the American people,” said Chairman John Kline (R-MN). “Taxpayers, workers, and job creators deserve to know what new rules are being developed by the federal bureaucracy. That’s why laws are in place to ensure transparency and accountability within the regulatory process. It is time the Obama administration met its legal obligation to disclose the regulations it intends to pursue.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 &lt;a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/laws/regulatory-flexibility/602.html"&gt;requires&lt;/a&gt; federal agencies to publish in April and October&amp;nbsp;a list of&amp;nbsp;economically significant regulations under development that could affect small businesses. Additionally, Executive Order 12866 &lt;a href="http://www.foreffectivegov.org/node/224"&gt;requires&lt;/a&gt; OMB to publish a semiannual unified agenda of all regulations that will be under development or review. Agencies submit their proposed regulations to OMB, which then discloses a complete list – referred to as the unified agenda – every six months. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama administration has routinely missed these deadlines. In fact, the administration failed to publish its Spring and Fall 2012 unified agendas, choosing instead to publish a &lt;a href="http://americanactionforum.org/topic/regulatory-calendar-administration-releases-2013-regulatory-plan"&gt;single unified regulatory agenda&lt;/a&gt; just days before Christmas. The Education and the Workforce Committee made &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=311512"&gt;numerous attempts&lt;/a&gt; last year to determine why the administration delayed release of its regulatory agendas, but the administration failed to provide adequate responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the members state in their letter:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote style="margin-right: 0px;" dir="ltr"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The administration’s actions have created an uncertain regulatory environment with real consequences across the economy. Regulatory uncertainty can hamper economic growth by undermining the ability of employers, workers, and entrepreneurs to hire, spend, and invest. Additionally, states, school districts, and institutions of higher education are impacted by the burdens created from new rules and regulations.&amp;nbsp;This is especially troubling in the midst of the country’s ongoing jobs crisis. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The committee leaders request a response by June 10, 2013. Those members signing the letter are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul style="list-style-type: disc;"&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Rep. John Kline, Chairman, Committee on Education and the Workforce&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Rep. Phil Roe (R-TN), Chairman, Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC), Chairwoman, Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Training&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI), Chairman, Subcommittee on Workforce Protections&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Rep. Todd Rokita (R-IN), Chairman, Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To read the letter, click &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/UploadedFiles/05-24-13_Letter_OMB_Regulatory_Agenda_Spring_2013.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335456</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335456</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kline Urges Increased Support for Students with Disabilities</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;House Committee on Education and the Workforce Chairman John Kline (R-MN) sent a &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/UploadedFiles/05-23-13-IDEA_Letter_to_Appropriators.pdf"&gt;letter&lt;/a&gt; urging the Chairman and Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health, and Human Services to focus on increasing funding for Part B of the &lt;em&gt;Individuals with Disabilities Education Act&lt;/em&gt; (IDEA) instead of supporting new and unproven programs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IDEA Part B is designed to help fund efforts by states and school districts to improve educational access and services for students with disabilities. Current law authorizes the federal government to fund up to 40 percent of the additional costs of educating students with disabilities yet federal contributions have continuously failed to reach that level. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During a hearing with Education Secretary Arne Duncan earlier this week, Chairman Kline expressed his disappointment in the administration’s proposed IDEA appropriations for Fiscal Year (FY) 2014. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Considering the glut of new spending in the president’s budget, the lack of funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act is simply appalling. Per the law, the federal government is supposed to fund up to 40 percent of the costs of educating students with special needs, but once again, the administration’s budget does not even come close to that figure,” Chairman Kline &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=334658"&gt;said&lt;/a&gt;. “I am concerned that instead of meeting our commitments and improving existing initiatives, the administration continues to propose more spending for new, untested programs.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/UploadedFiles/05-23-13-IDEA_Letter_to_Appropriators.pdf"&gt;letter&lt;/a&gt;, Chairman Kline asked the subcommittee to make increasing IDEA Part B funding a top priority in the FY 2014 Labor, Health and Human Services and Related Agencies Appropriations Act:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote dir="ltr"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Regrettably, recent years have brought steady decreases in the federal contribution. In FY 2013, the federal government is covering just 14.9 percent of the national average per pupil expenditure – and the Obama administration’s FY 2014 proposal again prioritizes pet projects, unauthorized programs, and new initiatives with no track record for success over meeting the needs of students with disabilities. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote dir="ltr"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;As our nation struggles with debt levels that have eclipsed the size of the entire U.S. economy, difficult choices must be made. We must stop wasting taxpayer dollars on new and ineffective programs and instead work toward meeting our basic obligation to ensure special needs children are prepared for success after high school. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To read the full letter, click &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/UploadedFiles/05-23-13-IDEA_Letter_to_Appropriators.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;# # # &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335388</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335388</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>House Approves Long-Term Solution to Student Loan Interest Rates</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The U.S. House of Representatives today approved the &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/smartersolutions/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Students Act&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(H.R. 1911), legislation that will prevent subsidized Stafford loans from doubling on July 1st. Introduced by Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (R-MN) and Higher Education and Workforce Training Subcommittee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx (R-NC), H.R. 1911 reflects President Obama’s request for a long-term, market-based solution to the student loan issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Today the House has taken action to prevent interest rates from doubling on millions of student loan borrowers," &lt;b&gt;said Chairman Kline&lt;/b&gt;. "President Obama asked for a long-term, market-based solution and that is precisely what we have delivered. It is now up to the Senate to move forward with its own ideas to solve the problem, so we can come together and send a bill to the president. The American people sent us here to tackle tough issues, not kick the can down the road. The time to act is now. Students, families, and taxpayers cannot afford further delay."
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Campaign promises and political posturing should not play a role in the calculation of student loan interest rates," &lt;strong&gt;said Rep. Foxx&lt;/strong&gt;. "As we’ve seen, Washington’s involvement in the rate-setting equation is a recipe for uncertainty and confusion. Borrowers deserve better. The Smarter Solution for Students Act puts an end to the temporary fixes that have failed to strengthen our nation’s student loan system and offers simplicity, rate caps and an assurance that interest rates are immediately in line with the free market – a need particularly acute in this jobless economy. If President Obama and Senate Democrats are serious about a long-term solution to the student loan interest rate problem, they will immediately consider and build on the ideas put forth in the Smarter Solutions for Students Act ."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The House also recently approved the &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/betterdata"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Improving Postsecondary Education Data for Students Act&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(H.R. 1949)&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt; Sponsored by Rep. Luke Messer (R-IN), the legislation will help enhance transparency in higher education. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Few decisions in life are bigger than whether to attend college and which college to attend,"&lt;b&gt; said Rep. Messer&lt;/b&gt;. "Yet many families find it a challenge to wade through the complicated maze of statistics available for this important decision. Through this bill, we hope to simplify the process and help students get access to the information they really need to make good decisions while lessening the burden on colleges and universities that have far too many reporting requirements today."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I want to thank Representative Messer for his leadership on the legislation," &lt;b&gt;said Chairman Kline&lt;/b&gt;. "In the coming months, the committee will continue the important task of reauthorizing the &lt;i&gt;Higher Education Act&lt;/i&gt;. Information is critical as families and students plan for college. We have to find better ways to give them the information they need without burying schools in paperwork. This legislation will help strengthen that effort and I look forward to working with all my colleagues on this issue."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To learn more about H.R. 1911, visit &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/smartersolutions/"&gt;edworkforce.house.gov/smartersolutions&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To learn more about H.R. 1949, visit &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/betterdata"&gt;edworkforce.house.gov/betterdata&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;# # # &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335230</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335230</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VIDEO RELEASE: Kline Encourages Colleagues to Vote 'Yes' on Legislation to Prevent Student Loan Interest Rate Cliff </title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The House is &lt;a href="http://houselive.gov/"&gt;currently considering&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/smartersolutions/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Students Act&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (H.R. 1911), legislation that will move all federal student loans (except Perkins Loans) to a market-based rate. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moments ago, House Education and Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (R-MN) urged his colleagues to support this responsible proposal:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/X-TXyNs6-CA?showinfo=0" frameborder="0"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;We have an opportunity today to get politicians out of the business of setting student loan interest rates. We have an opportunity to provide students more stability in the long run by putting an end to quick fixes and campaign promises. And we have an opportunity to build upon common ground with the administration and advance a bipartisan solution that’s a win for both students and taxpayers.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Similar to a plan put forth in President Obama’s Fiscal Year 2014 budget request, H.R. 1911 would set federal student loan interest rates using a formula based on the 10-year Treasury note. Not only will the bill prevent student loan interest rates from doubling on July 1, 2013, the &lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Students Act&lt;/i&gt; will also provide certainty for millions of borrowers by tying interest rates to the free market rather than the political whims of Washington.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To learn more about the &lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Students Act&lt;/i&gt;, click here &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/smartersolutions/"&gt;edworkforce.house.gov/SmarterSolutions&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;# # #&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335202</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335202</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VIDEO RELEASE: Rep. Luke Messer Urges Support for Legislation to Enhance Higher Education Transparency</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The U.S. House of Representatives recently approved the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/betterdata/"&gt;Improving Postsecondary Education Data for Students Act&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; (H.R. 1949). Sponsored by Rep. Luke Messer (R-IN), the legislation will help strengthen higher education transparency and ensure students and families have access to the data they need to choose the right college. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During debate on the House floor, Rep. Messer highlighted the need to improve higher education data and explained how H.R. 1949 will help guide the committee’s efforts to provide students with the most relevant information: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Ti4Iqu3paeM?showinfo=0" frameborder="0"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Few decisions in life are bigger than whether to attend college and which college to attend. Yet many families struggle to wade through the complicated maze of statistics to find the information they need to make fully informed, cost-conscious decisions...Through the Improving Postsecondary Education Data for Students Act, we hope to simplify the process and help ensure students can access the information they need to make good decisions while lessening the burden on colleges and universities that have far too many reporting requirements today.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To learn more about the &lt;i&gt;Improving Postsecondary Education Data for Students Act,&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;visit &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/betterdata/"&gt;edworkforce.house.gov/BetterData&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;# # #&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335156</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335156</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kline and Foxx: Getting politics out of student loans</title>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;table cellpadding="5"&gt;
    &lt;tbody&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td&gt;
            &lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;img alt="" width="300" height="38" src="http://edworkforce.house.gov/UploadedPhotos/HighResolution/65e4177e-d5a1-4c50-b145-857140797fbf.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
    &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bipartisan compromise is tough to find in Washington right now — but when there is opportunity for agreement, we owe it to the American people to take action.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the coming weeks, millions of student-loan borrowers could see their interest rates double from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent. We’re in this predicament because politicians put themselves in charge of setting interest rates, guaranteeing uncertainty for students and more infighting in Congress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Students deserve a long-term solution that gets Washington out of the business of setting student-loan interest rates. Fortunately, President Obama agrees. In his budget for the next fiscal year, the president offered a plan to tie rates to the free market.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Heartened by the president’s proposal, Republicans put together a similar measure, the Smarter Solutions for Students Act, which the House will consider on Thursday. Just like the president’s plan, our legislation will apply a market-based interest rate to all federal Stafford and PLUS loans, ensuring borrowers will be able to take advantage of today’s low rates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By tying rates to the market, the Smarter Solutions for Students Act sets a predictable formula for interest-rate calculations, insulated from the politics and posturing of Washington. Additionally, we protect students from high interest-rate environments by imposing a fair and reasonable cap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s why we’re shifting away from fixed rates. First, fixed rates function problematically as both a floor and ceiling for borrowers. They sound like a great plan until lower rates become available in the market — something we’re seeing today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second, administering federal student-loan programs comes with a cost. We readily acknowledge politicians don’t have the know-how to pick static interest rates that will work for borrowers and fund student-loan programs without leaving taxpayers on the hook for students’ low interest rates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Smarter Solutions for Students Act is the product of numerous hearings and discussions with higher-education experts. It’s been written in good faith. Despite our best efforts, however, this responsible legislation has already come under fire from some congressional Democrats. These defenders of the status quo are angry that the Smarter Solutions for Students Act will allow interest rates to fluctuate with the market, and claim a better plan is to simply extend current rates for another year or two at a cost of roughly $8 billion. We respect their views, but their plan just passes the buck, once again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Students deserve better. They shouldn’t have to watch Congress hold their interest rates hostage, or see them used as bargaining chips each election year. They shouldn’t have to deal with the uncertainty that comes with waiting for Congress to cobble together another temporary fix to keep interest rates in line with the market.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That’s what the Smarter Solutions for Students Act is all about. It will put an end to the quick fixes and campaign promises that have failed to strengthen our nation’s student-loan system. Our proposal offers predictability, simplicity and the flexibility to take advantage of low interest rates whenever possible. In fact, should this legislation be enacted this summer, most student-loan borrowers will see their interest rates drop as much as 2 percentage points. It’s a win for students, and a win for taxpayers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is growing consensus in Washington that tying rates back to the free market is the right way forward. Instead of finding excuses to politicize the issue, this should be an opportunity to build on common ground as we look to address the big challenges facing the nation’s education system. We hope the administration and our colleagues in the House and Senate will stand by the president’s proposal and help us move the Smarter Solutions for Students Act swiftly through Congress and onto his desk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; # # #&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335141</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335141</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kline Statement: H.R. 1911, The Smarter Solutions for Students Act </title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We’re here today to address a crisis of Washington’s own making. Several years ago, Congress decided politicians – not the free market – were better equipped to set student loan interest rates. Politicians set a fixed rate of 6.8 percent for all loans, and then decided to advance legislation based on a campaign promise that would temporarily phase this rate for subsidized Stafford loans down to 3.4 percent. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last summer, with the expiration of the lower rate scheduled for July 1, 2012, debate about student loans reached a fever pitch. The president began touring college campuses, calling on Congress to prevent the increase that his own party set in motion back in 2007. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I said at the time, no one wanted to see interest rates double – particularly at a time when 1 out of every 2 college graduates was struggling to find a full time job. But we need to move away from a system that allows Washington politicians to use student loan interest rates as bargaining chips, creating uncertainty and confusion for borrowers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When Congress approved legislation to temporarily stave off the Stafford Loan interest rate increase, my colleagues and I lent our support with the promise that we would use this time to work toward a long-term solution that better aligns interest rates with the free market. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Students Act&lt;/i&gt; accomplishes this goal by simply moving all federal student loans – except Perkins loans – to a market-based interest rate system. This responsible legislation builds upon a proposal put forth by President Obama earlier this year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Students Act&lt;/i&gt; is a narrow piece of legislation that will provide a lasting solution to the problem facing the federal student loan program. Unfortunately, some critics would rather kick the can down the road and simply extend the current arbitrary rates at a taxpayer cost of roughly $8 billion dollars. They want to continue the failed status quo and leave politicians in charge of setting rates. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week, the &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; called it a “weird fact” that student loan interest rates “aren’t pegged to anything real, just to the whims of Congress, which inevitably uses student loans as political playthings.” Students deserve better. They shouldn’t have to watch as Washington holds their interest rates hostage each election year. They shouldn’t have to deal with the uncertainty that comes with waiting for politicians to cobble together another temporary fix to keep interest rates in line with the market. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have an opportunity today to get politicians out of the business of setting student loan interest rates. We have an opportunity to provide students more stability in the long run by putting an end to quick fixes and campaign promises. And we have an opportunity to build upon common ground with the administration and advance a bipartisan solution that’s a win for both students and taxpayers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: left;"&gt; I urge my colleagues to support the &lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Students Act&lt;/i&gt; and reserve the balance of my time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; # # # &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335212</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335212</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>THEN vs. NOW: Education Secretary Flip-Flops on Support for Long-Term Student Loan Solution</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Once again Washington is working to prevent subsidized Stafford Loan interest rates from doubling. The House is expected to vote tomorrow on the &lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Student Act, &lt;/i&gt;legislation that provides a permanent solution on behalf of students and taxpayers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just yesterday Education Secretary Arne Duncan assured Congress that the Obama administration&amp;nbsp;wants a long-term solution. However, a &lt;a href="http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/statement-secretary-duncan-preventing-student-loan-interest-rates-doubling-july-"&gt;new statement&lt;/a&gt; from the department calls into question the veracity of the secretary’s testimony: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;THEN:&lt;/b&gt; “The fact that we can’t think long-term, the fact that we can’t take a tough issue, deal with it, move it off the table, and&amp;nbsp;move onto other issues I just don’t understand that thinking. So &lt;u&gt;we are interested in a long-term fix, we are interested in it being budget-neutral and look forward to continue conversations with you and others to find some common ground&lt;/u&gt;.” (Testimony before the House Education and the Workforce Committee, &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=334851"&gt;05/21/13&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NOW:&lt;/b&gt; “Given the impending July 1 deadline, &lt;u&gt;an extension that protects students against higher rates while Congress develops an alternative solution is another reasonable option&lt;/u&gt;.” ("Statement from Secretary Duncan on Preventing Student Loan Interest Rates from Doubling on July 1," &lt;a href="http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/statement-secretary-duncan-preventing-student-loan-interest-rates-doubling-july-"&gt;05/22/13&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remarkably, it appears Secretary Duncan was also being less than candid when he suggested a willingness to work together to “find some common ground.”&amp;nbsp;Earlier today&amp;nbsp;the White House &lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/sap/113/saphr1911r_20130522.pdf"&gt;threatened to veto the only plan that meets the president’s goal&lt;/a&gt; for a market-based, long-term solution. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Chairman Kline &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=335081"&gt;said&lt;/a&gt; in response to this disappointing veto threat: “&lt;u&gt;Today’s announcement proves the president would rather pick a partisan fight with Congress instead of work in good faith on a bipartisan solution.&lt;/u&gt;”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The American people deserve to know: Does the president support&amp;nbsp;a long-term solution or not? And when will the Obama administration engage Congress in a serious discussion to address an important issue facing our families and students?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: center;"&gt;# # #&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335112</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335112</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kline Responds to Administration’s Statement on House Republican Student Loan Bill</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;House Committee on Education and the Workforce Chairman John Kline (R-MN) today released the following statement after the Obama administration threatened to veto H.R. 1911, the &lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Students Act&lt;/i&gt;: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I’m disappointed the administration has threatened to veto the Smarter Solutions for Students Act. The legislation is based on the president’s own proposal, and provides a solid basis for negotiation through the legislative process. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The administration wanted a long-term solution that put the market – not Congress – in charge of setting student loan interest rates, and that’s exactly what the Smarter Solutions for Students Act will do. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The administration wanted to prevent student loan interest rates from doubling in July, and H.R. 1911 accomplishes that goal as well. In fact, most borrowers will see their interest rates drop by as much as 2 percent if this bill is enacted this summer.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The administration wanted to protect students against higher interest rates. The Smarter Solutions For Students Act includes a reasonable cap to keep interest rates from climbing too high and allows students to consolidate their loans into a low fixed rate upon graduation.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Finally, the administration wanted a proposal that was budget neutral, and H.R. 1911 generates roughly the same 10 year savings as President Obama’s own plan. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Today’s announcement proves the president would rather pick a partisan fight with Congress instead of work in good faith on a bipartisan solution. The president’s unfortunate position does not alter our intent to advance the bill through the legislative process or our resolve to develop a long-term solution that both the House and the president can support.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At a hearing in the Education and the Workforce Committee, Secretary Duncan offered his support for a long-term solution to address the student loan interest rate problem. His remarks can be viewed &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=334851"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/smartersolutions/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Smarter Solutions for Students Act&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (H.R. 1911) would take politicians out of the business of calculating student loan interest rates by moving all federal student loans (except Perkins Loans) to a new interest rate formula based on the 10-year Treasury Note, similar to a proposal put forth in President Obama’s Fiscal Year 2014 budget plan. To learn more about H.R. 1911, visit &lt;a href="http://edworkforce.house.gov/SmarterSolutions"&gt;edworkforce.house.gov/SmarterSolutions&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335081</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=335081</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Walberg Statement: Hearing on "Examining the Regulatory and Enforcement Actions of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission"</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Chair Berrien we are pleased to see you today. It has been a long time since the committee convened a hearing to examine the policies and priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. We are grateful you’ve joined us and thank you for your service to our country. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Republicans and Democrats share the same goal: We want to ensure the American people work in an environment free of discrimination. Whether or not an individual succeeds in a workplace should be determined by merit and hard work, not the unlawful prejudice of their boss. For most employers, a person’s skills and drive to succeed are what matter most. However, bad actors will put personal bigotries before the talent and dedication of America’s workers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A recent case out of Davenport, Iowa provides a stunning example of this difficult reality. According to reports, 32 men with intellectual disabilities were subjected to abuse and discrimination. The deplorable treatment these men faced included verbal and physical harassment, substandard living conditions, and inadequate medical care. EEOC is to be applauded for helping to bring those who committed these heinous acts to justice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination should be vigorously and fairly enforced. That’s why we are here today. There has been a significant shift in both the enforcement and regulatory priorities at EEOC in recent years. It is our responsibility to ask tough questions to ensure agency policies are in the best interests of workers and employers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, does it serve the best interests of workers and employers when EEOC investigates businesses without evidence of wrongdoing? The agency has set a goal that up to 24 percent of all litigated cases be systemic in nature. At times, these investigations are launched without any employee alleging discrimination. Meanwhile, a backlog of more than 70,000 discrimination claims by workers continues to plague the commission.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At a time of high unemployment and record federal debt, every job and dollar counts. We should not be diverting scarce resources away from workers who believe they’ve been harmed in order to follow a hunch. And we should not be dragging our nation’s&amp;nbsp; job creators through unnecessary and costly investigations without a factual basis of wrongdoing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does it also serve the best interest of workers and employers when the full weight of the agency’s litigation power is ceded to one individual? Congress created a commission of five members to ensure accountability within the agency. Yet for almost 20 years the commission has delegated that authority to the Office of General Counsel.&amp;nbsp; Under only limited circumstances can the commission vote on the general counsel’s decision to intervene in litigation and these narrow exceptions are not always clear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, the general counsel has almost complete control over EEOC’s enforcement agenda. This cannot be what Congress intended and it’s having a real impact on the lives of workers. One case initiated by the general counsel was later rejected by a federal district judge. The judge described the commission’s actions as a “sue first, ask questions later litigation strategy” and noted that “dozens of potentially meritorious sexual harassment claims may now never see the inside of a courtroom.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally, is it in the best interests of workers and employers when the commission pursues regulatory policies that may make workplaces less safe?&amp;nbsp; In April 2012, EEOC revised its long-standing guidance on the use of criminal background checks. Should the background check reveal a criminal offense, employers will have to conduct an “individual assessment” and identify a “business necessity” that merits denying the individual employment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this proposal has already been criticized by one federal court. As one federal judge noted almost 25 years ago, “Obviously a rule refusing honest employment to convicted applicants is going to have an disparate impact upon thieves.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This policy also puts many employers at risk of running afoul of state or local laws that require background checks for certain positions of public trust, such as child care providers. Employers will bear the burden of any unintended consequences stemming from this regulatory change, not EEOC.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yet they and the public were denied an opportunity to comment on the proposal before it became final. Public meetings on broader topics isn’t the level of openness and transparency the American people deserve. Shouldn’t workers and employers have an opportunity to comment on policy changes that affect their workplaces?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chair Berrien, these are serious questions that I hope we can discuss with you today. I know that is a lot to address in one hearing. However, we hope this hearing starts a new, more open dialogue between the committee and EEOC. As I noted earlier, we all share the same goal and only when we work together can we move closer toward that goal. Thank you again for being with us today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;# # #&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=334889</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=334889</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"A Culture of Favoritism: The Obama Administration's Labor Agenda"</title>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=196002</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=196002</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:37:30 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Strengthening the Economy and Improving the Lives of American Workers" </title>
      <description>http://edwork.edgeboss.net/wmedia/edwork/fc/fc020310.wvx</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193437</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193437</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:40:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H.R. 4247, "Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act"</title>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=191040</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=191040</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:29:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Reducing the Growing Backlog of Contested Mine Safety Cases"</title>
      <description>http://edwork.edgeboss.net/wmedia/edwork/fc/fc022310.wvx</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193436</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193436</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:38:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H.R. 4330, "All Students Achieving through Reform Act of 2009"</title>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193435</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193435</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:33:39 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Improving Children's Health:  Strengthening Federal Child Nutrition Programs" </title>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193433</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193433</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Building a Stronger Economy:  Spurring Reform and Innovation in American Education" </title>
      <description>http://edwork.edgeboss.net/wmedia/edwork/fc/fc020310.wvx</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193431</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193431</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H.R. 413, "Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act of 2009"</title>
      <description>http://edwork.edgeboss.net/wmedia/edwork/help/help031010.wvx</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193430</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193430</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Meeting the Challenges Faced by Girls in the Juvenile Justice System"</title>
      <description>http://edwork.edgeboss.net/wmedia/edwork/hfc/hfc031110.wvx</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193429</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193429</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:20:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Protecting America's Workers Act:  Modernizing OSHA Penalties"</title>
      <description>http://edwork.edgeboss.net/wmedia/edwork/wp/wp031610.wvx</description>
      <link>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193423</link>
      <guid>http://edworkforce.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=193423</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>