More Reasons EFCA Must Fail No. 3: Even EFCA Supporters Seem Confused About What’s In the Bill
WASHINGTON, D.C.,
October 22, 2009
|
Alexa Marrero
((202) 225-4527)
There’s a compromise version of the Employee Free Choice Act that’s almost ready … or is it?
In a speech before the AFL-CIO last month, Sen. Arlen Specter said an EFCA deal had been “pounded out” and it would pass before year’s end. The newly Democratic lawmaker received great applause from the crowd in response to this surprising announcement. He also received a great many questions from reporters and even some fellow EFCA supporters about what exactly he meant. National Journal’s CongressDaily tried to clear up the confusion here:
Specter’s comments are just the latest in a long line of murky pronouncements about the act’s prospects in Congress and details of closed-door negotiations on alternative plans for the bill. For example, Sen. Sherrod Brown, a key EFCA negotiator, has been described as “not happy” with the compromise version – and unsure if it will gain the votes needed for passage. It was not so long ago that Senate Majority Harry Reid declared that EFCA will not get a vote because “we have too many other things on our plate.” This was roughly a month after Roll Call reported that Reid and other Senate Democrats were looking for ways to railroad the bill through the chamber as fast as possible to avoid debate and opposition. Sen. Tom Harkin, another key EFCA dealmaker, has declined to provide details of EFCA’s progress but has said he “took it off the front-burner and put it on the back-burner, so it is still on warm, OK?” Hot, cold, warm, whatever. The Employee Free Choice Act has been a terrible bill from the start, with its ability to kill jobs in an already down economy, force government contracts on struggling small businesses, and set aside a worker’s right to a secret ballot. It’s a mess, plain and simple, and the best way to clean it up is to not pass it in the first place. # # # |