SEIU Acknowledges Potential for Card Check to Intimidate, Mislead Workers
WASHINGTON, D.C.,
June 24, 2009
|
Alexa Marrero
((202) 225-4527)
The proposal to conduct union organizing through a public card signing process is surely the most infamous provision of the so-called Employee Free Choice Act. In fact, it’s where the bill gets its better-known nickname, “card check.”
The provision has come under fire because of its obvious potential to harm workers by denying them the privacy and protection of a secret ballot election. It’s a well-known argument, but it still may have come as a surprise to some when the Service Employees International Union – one of the biggest backers of the card check plan – sounded the alarm about the card signing process underway in an internal battle between the union and a newly-formed rival:
Pringle, “SEIU borrows business' anti-union tactics to fend off a rival,” Los Angeles Times, 06.24.09 Republicans – and more than a few Democrats – have warned for months about the potential for intimidation, coercion, and the threat of retribution in public card signing organizing drives. In fact, the Education and Labor Committee heard testimony during the 110th Congress about exactly what type of unsavory tactics can be used to pressure workers into signing cards. That’s why Republicans continue to support the Secret Ballot Protection Act. It guarantees that all workplace organizing will take place with the protection of a secret ballot vote, guarding workers against being intimidated or misled. # # # |