Legal Scholar Details Arguments Against Anti-Worker Card Check Plan
WASHINGTON, D.C.,
February 10, 2009
|
Alexa Marrero
((202) 225-4527)
The card check method for requiring workers to publicly declare support for forming a union has already proven unpopular with the American people and with opinion leaders around the country. Now a top legal scholar has weighed in, publishing a detailed analysis that debunks the false claims made by card check supporters and makes a compelling case that enactment of the misnamed Employee Free Choice Act would harm individual businesses and their workers, and the U.S. economy as a whole.
Richard A. Epstein, a legal scholar with The University of Chicago Law School, The Hoover Institution at Stanford University, and New York University Law School, has written The Case Against the Employee Free Choice Act, a paper soon to be published by the Hoover Press. He outlines some of the arguments against card check in an opinion piece published today on Forbes.com. Among his findings—
With some 74 percent of voters opposed to card check and the plan itself drawing legal and economic criticism, it’s a wonder anyone is still fighting to strip workers of the right to a secret ballot. # # # |