Breaking Down A Bad Bill
WASHINGTON, D.C.,
October 6, 2009
|
Alexa Marrero
((202) 225-4527)
If you want to know why the Employee Free Choice Act slipped into a legislative coma, ask Peter D. Conrad.
Conrad wrote an essay for The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel explaining in detail how the act, which began with great promise thanks to presidential support and a Democratic-led Congress, has become mercifully inert for U.S. workers. The reasons range from a strong bipartisan defense of the secret ballot to the health care reform debate to the untimely passing of Sen. Ted Kennedy. Conrad, a New York labor lawyer, also examined some of the rumored compromises to the EFCA bill, such as “quickie” elections, and found that they are just as bad as the original bill:
Conrad, “Fast Track Elections Likely To Replace Card-Check In EFCA Compromise Bill,” Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, 10.04.09 With proponents of the legislation still aggressively pursuing these flawed “compromises,” Conrad has declared EFCA a “moving target” in the legislative process and not completely halted. He is right to remain cautious. His warnings about the flaws inherent in these alleged “compromises” explain why the Employee Free Choice Act should not pass in any form – there can be no compromise when it comes to workers’ rights and the future of the U.S. economy. The stakes are simply too high. # # # |