More Reasons EFCA Must Fail No. 10: Substituting One Bad Idea for Another Is Not a “Compromise”
WASHINGTON, D.C.,
October 13, 2009
|
Alexa Marrero
((202) 225-4527)
Kicking off the countdown of 10 more reasons the so-called Employee Free Choice Act must fail is a look at why – when it comes to jobs and workers’ rights – there can be no compromise.
With EFCA seemingly stalled in the Senate, supporters have been suggesting “compromises” to the bill – including dropping its dreaded “card check” provision. But as several observers have pointed out, these “compromises” aren’t any better than the original bill itself. Take a group of Indiana business executives who recently wrote an essay about the attempts to rescue this sinking bill:
Budd et al., “It’s time to stand up for Hoosier jobs,” The Star Press (Muncie, Ind.), 09.27.09 Their concerns echo those set forth by other wary EFCA watchers. For example, that “EFCA's mandatory first-contract arbitration provision is unrealistic, vague and unfair.” Or that it would “slash the time for an organizing vote from a median 38 days to only five or 10 days after 30 percent of workers request a union.” No matter how many ways supporters disguise it, the Employee Free Choice Act is a bad idea. And trading one bad idea for another is not a “compromise.” It’s desperate. It’s time for EFCA to go under for good. # # # |