Committee Leaders Introduce Bipartisan Reforms to Federal Workers' Compensation ProgramRequests GAO report to examine areas for further reform
WASHINGTON, D.C.,
July 8, 2011
Today, leaders of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce introduced the Federal Workers’ Compensation Modernization and Improvement Act (H.R. 2465), bipartisan legislation to reform the existing federal workers' compensation program.
Since 1916, a federal program has provided compensation benefits to federal employees who become injured or ill through a work-related activity. However, the program has not been significantly reformed in almost 40 years, and as a result, a number of weaknesses have emerged that demand Congressional action. H.R. 2465 will update and enhance the efficiency of the federal workers’ compensation program, thereby ensuring the program best meets the needs of both workers and taxpayers. "Leaving government programs on auto-pilot for decades is simply unacceptable," said Chairman John Kline (R-MN). "Congress has a responsibility to ensure the agencies and programs under our jurisdiction serve the best interests of taxpayers and the individuals they were created to serve. I want to thank my colleagues for working together on bipartisan solutions that will help bring this program into the 21st century." “I am pleased that the committee worked in a bipartisan way to enhance our nation’s workers compensation system for federal employees," said George Miller (D-CA), the senior Democrat of the committee. "The legislation will make important program integrity improvements and will update benefit levels not adjusted for inflation since 1949. I agree with the majority that other programmatic changes recommended by the administration require further examination.” H.R. 2465 will reform the federal workers' compensation program by:
Additionally, committee leaders sent a letter to the Government Accountability Office asking for a comprehensive review of additional reforms that may be needed to stregthen the program and the impact of these potential reforms on beneficiaries. # # # |